• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Large-scale production in a single step and at room temperature of material composed of few graphene sheets with a high degree of defects by means of high-energy oscillatory dry mechanical milling. The present invention falls within the manufacturing of graphene-based materials in powder form with industrial scalability. The particles obtained are mesoporous, they are composed of few layers of graphene with a high degree of defects with great chemical stability and can be used in multidisciplinary technological fields such as catalysis, selective gas sensors and materials that absorb electromagnetic radiation in the microwave region. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
    公开号:ES2779151A1
    申请号:ES202030709
    申请日:2020-07-10
    公开日:2020-08-13
    发明作者:Palacios María Pilar Marín；Palma Elena Navarro；Sánchez Jesús López；Moreno Alvaro Peña；Güemes Mari Carmen Horrillo；Cruz Daniel Matatagui
    申请人:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas CSIC；Universidad Complutense de Madrid；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    [0002] Large-scale production in one step and at room temperature of material composed of few graphene sheets with a high degree of defects by means of high-energy oscillatory dry mechanical milling
    [0004] TECHNICAL SECTOR
    [0006] The present invention falls within the manufacture of graphene-based materials in powder form with industrial scalability. The particles obtained are composed of few layers of graphene with a high degree of defects and great chemical stability and can be used in multidisciplinary technological fields such as catalysis, biomedicine, chemical sensors or as absorbing materials for electromagnetic radiation in the region of microwave oven.
    [0008] BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
    [0010] In recent years, a great commercial, scientific and technological interest has been generated in the production of two-dimensional materials such as graphene and graphene-based composites (GBMs for its acronym in English for graphene-based materials). These stand out mainly for their high density of charge carriers, high mechanical resistance and high chemical stability [Geim, AK, et al. ( 2007 ). The nse of graphene. Nature Materials, 6, 183-191. doi: 10.1038 / nmat1849]. For this reason, the need arises to obtain these interesting materials in a reproducible way, on a large scale and for the physical and / or chemical processes of obtaining to be relatively simple and inexpensive.
    [0012] Strictly speaking, graphene is a sheet of monatomic thickness (around 0.335 nm) composed of carbon atoms joined by sp2 bonds with a hexagonal crystallographic structure.In turn, there is also bilayer, tri-layer graphene and a large number of different allotropes. of carbon such as graphite, carbon nanotubes or fullerenes. All of them make up different nanostructured arrangements that have unique and different physical properties.
    [0013] Monolayer graphene has far superior properties compared to other materials. These properties are its high mobility of charge carriers, its excellent thermal conductivity and / or its high mechanical resistance. However, application development is limited in some cases. On the other hand, GBMs have properties that can be better adapted to the requirements of potential electronic applications. These are, for example, bilayer graphene, to which a range of forbidden energy can be introduced by a barrier potential.
    [0015] Delving into the GBM family, the stacking of few graphene sheets (between 3 and 10 layers) and graphene nanoplates also stand out. These nanostructures fulfill the role of reinforcing material in composites with a generally polymeric or metallic matrix, where they improve the properties of thermal or electrical conduction, the mechanical properties and / or the chemical stability against environmental degradation.
    [0017] A material consisting of few sheets of graphene (FLG from now on by its acronym in English few-layer graphene) is composed of an ordered stack between 3 and 10 layers of graphene according to ISO / TS 80004-13: 2017 (E). These nanostructured sheets are characterized by having a high specific interaction surface (higher than monolayer graphene) and have a thickness whose dimension is on the scale of a few nanometers or less. These sheets can be presented isolated or stacked together. The physical properties derived from the bonds between more superficial carbon atoms contained in the sheet are different and differ energetically from the bonds between carbon atoms that constitute the massive material. This fact gives the material obtained interesting structural properties and unique electronic properties. In addition, they have great versatility and industrial application since FLGs can be disposed in powder form. Here, the objective of the present invention is disclosed: the manufacture of FLG in a homogeneous, reproducible and industrially scaled manner with good structural and electrical properties and great chemical stability.
    [0019] The state of the art related to the manufacture of FLG can be divided into two types of methods: bottom-up (in English bottom-up) and top-down (in English top-down). Bottom-up methods , such as chemical vapor deposition or growth Atomic epitaxial layer by layer on a certain substrate, they start from a material with a smaller scale than the final product. With them, GBMs of high crystalline quality are obtained, but they present a high technical complexity in their manufacture, such as the growth of material in high or ultra-high vacuum hoods, or heat treatments at high temperatures and / or high times to obtain relatively little amount of material (grown on substrates of the order of millimeters). Therefore, these routes do not seem suitable for the manufacture of FLG on a large scale that can satisfy the demand for this material in the future [Claudia Backes et al. (2020). Production and processing of Graphene and related materials.
    [0020] 2D Materials 7, 022001. doi: 10.1088 / 2053-1583 / ab1e0a].
    [0022] On the other hand, top-down methods generally start from graphite in the massive state as raw material and seek to separate sheets of graphene (or FLG) by means of chemical or mechanical exfoliation. Contrary to bottom-up methods , the final product has a greater number of defects, but large quantities of material (several grams) are obtained with low production costs since they are generally carried out at room temperature, without using vacuum equipment and they are a great advantage for large-scale production [Claudia Backes et al. (2020). Production and processing of Graphene and related materials. 2D Materials 7, 022001. doi: 10.1088 / 2053-1583 / ab1e0a].
    [0024] Within the exfoliation of graphene layers by chemical means, the most widely used method is the Hummers method modified from the original published in 1958 [William S. et al. (1958). Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 80, 1339-1339. doi: 10.1021 / ja01539a017]. With this method, large quantities of high purity material are obtained, but it has the disadvantage of involving a large number of chemical steps (some of them imply a spontaneous temperature increase up to 100 ° C). In addition, solvents and strongly reducing and oxidizing agents are used. These are potentially dangerous and pose an added difficulty for industrial scale production.
    [0026] Regarding the exfoliation of graphene layers by physical means, the oscillating mechanical grinding carried out in ball mills stands out. This technique effectively reduces the particle size and is commonly used in large-scale industrial processes due to its low cost, its operating temperature close to that of the environment, its simplicity of operation, and its great versatility in manufacturing parameters (for example, use of precursors in powder form and / or variation of the oscillation frequency to reduce the physical size of the particle on demand).
    [0028] There are mechanical wet grinding processes (such as those described in documents CN107973293A, CN110117006A or WO2017128929A1) where some type of solvent is used (sometimes combined with other additives), to assist the exfoliation process. In this case, a subsequent purification process is necessary to separate the solid phase from the solvent.
    [0030] In dry mechanical milling, no solvents are used, although it is possible to use additives to assist exfoliation (as described, for example, in CN106744877A). The use of additives increases the complexity of the process, the materials used and, in some cases, can compromise the characteristics of the final product. Some additives used in dry mechanical milling are: i) dry ice [Jeon, IY, et al. (2012). Edge-carboxylated graphene nanosheets via ball milling. PNAS 109, 5588-5593. doi: 10.1073 / pnas.11168971091; ii) fatty acids (WO 2017/105208 A1); iii) additives based on aromatic rings (WO 2017/056086 AI). The material obtained from these investigations shows defects and / or modifications in chemical properties. In addition, to eliminate its presence in the final product, additional processes may be necessary to the manufacture of FLG. For example, to remove ammonium chloride (NH4CO, a heat treatment at 800 ° C for 1 hour in a nitrogen atmosphere is required [D. Liu, D., et al. (2015). Scalable production of winkled and few-layered graphene sheets and their use for oil and organic solvents absorption. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 19, 6913 6918. doi: 10.1039 / C4CP05864J]; or instead, in patent WO 2017/056086 AI, filtering and washing processes are carried out in water to obtain graphene nanoplates and remove added aromatic compounds.
    [0032] According to the above, the methods that currently exist for the large-scale manufacture of FLG from graphite flakes by means of high-energy oscillating mechanical grinding have the disadvantage of requiring previous treatments, heat treatments or the presence of additives or solvents, which complicate the process. process.
    [0033] Therefore, a simple, one-step, inexpensive, and large-scale manufacturing method would be desirable.
    [0035] The present invention encompasses a method that meets these desired characteristics by choosing a graphite precursor with flakes of a specific size and specific high-energy oscillating mechanical milling conditions.
    [0037] EXPLANATION OF THE INVENTION
    [0039] The present invention relates to a high energy oscillating mechanical milling method using as precursor monocrystalline graphite in the form of flakes of size between 2 and 50 pm and thicknesses of a few tens of nanometers. This grinding is carried out in a dry environment, at room temperature, without chemical additives or subsequent heat treatments, which allows a material based on FLG to be obtained quickly and on a large scale for use in potential applications.
    [0041] The approach developed in the present invention is based on this high energy oscillating mechanical milling method and takes advantage of the laminar nature of graphite in bulk state to exfoliate material of small sizes in the form of FLG. The n -n bonds formed between sheets are generally weaker than the covalent bonds from the carbon atoms that make up the network. Therefore, the material undergoes an "anisotropic" size reduction with a tendency to exfoliation during milling. In addition, once the material is exfoliated, this method has a great advantage to form materials rich in FLG since these tend to organize in the form of stacks.
    [0043] In the present invention, neither solvents nor chemical additives are used, which on a large scale would imply an agile and simple manufacturing process. This type of dry grinding without additives has already been used before to obtain graphene oxide. As a novelty in this work, a flake-shaped monocrystalline graphite precursor is used to which a very precise control of the energy of the milling process must be applied, which must be between 1000 and 1500 revolutions per minute (rpm). In addition, the grinding is carried out in a metal container covered with a material that has a Knoop hardness greater than 1,000 kg / mm2.
    [0044] With this approach, FLGs of higher crystalline quality are obtained directly than those obtained by the other methods previously described. This approach is contrary to the investigations carried out on this material where the main aim is to exfoliate FLG with low milling energies (<300 rpm) and low amounts of this nanostructured material are obtained [Zhu, H., et al. (2016). One-step preparation of graphene nanosheets via ball milling of graphite and the application in lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Science, 51.3675-3683. doi: 10.1007 / s10853-015-9655-z].
    [0046] The resulting material of the present invention has a large number of structural defects and a strong tendency to agglomerate between nanoparticles. However, these characteristics are advantageous and this effective nanostructuring of graphite in FLG has a large number of applications, such as resistive gas sensors.
    [0048] Detailed description of the invention
    [0050] The present invention details a new method of producing FLG with a high degree of defects by high energy dry milling without additives and at room temperature from a graphite precursor in the form of monocrystalline flakes. The material is obtained in a single step and features easy industrial scaling. Furthermore, it exhibits physical properties that make it suitable for use as a gas selective resistive sensor or as a radiation absorbing material in the microwave range.
    [0052] The procedure comprises the following stages:
    [0054] a) The process is carried out in an oscillating motion ball mill only from monocrystalline graphite in the form of flakes. This precursor is between 2 and 50 pm in length and is less than 100 nm thick.
    [0056] b) The precursor is introduced into a metal container whose interior is coated with tungsten carbide to avoid contamination and / or formation of unwanted phases.
    [0057] c) A tungsten carbide ball is added which has a volume ratio with the precursor graphite powder of approximately 1: 1 and with the container of approximately 1:50.
    [0059] d) The container is closed and introduced into the mill enclaves to proceed with high-energy oscillating milling.
    [0061] e) The frequency must be between 15 and 30 Hz, preferably 25 Hz. These values imply oscillation frequencies between 1000 and 1500 rpm. The process is carried out under ambient temperature and pressure conditions.
    [0063] f) To obtain homogeneous samples with a large amount of FLG, the grinding process time must be between 100 and 240 minutes. Pauses between 15 and 30 minutes are included to bring the material and grinding equipment to thermalization at room temperature and thus avoid unwanted increases in temperature within the jars generated by friction during oscillating dry grinding. Otherwise, it could adversely affect the effective exfoliation process of FLG and / or generation of unwanted secondary phases.
    [0065] The samples in powder form obtained have structural properties of FLG. These FLGs have between 3 and 10 layers of graphene, are not oxidized by the milling process, present structural defects and have an electromagnetic absorption with a maximum around 260 nm (ultraviolet region). All these properties are the basis of its application in the technological fields mentioned above.
    [0067] BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    [0069] To complement the description that is being made and in order to help a better understanding of the characteristics of the invention, a set of drawings is attached as an integral part of said description, in which, with an illustrative and non-limiting nature, the following has been represented following:
    [0070] Figure 1 shows the crystalline structure, morphology and size of the starting precursor graphite in flake form by means of MET images (Figures a and b) and SEM (Figure c).
    [0072] Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the precursor graphite and its evolution as a function of milling time from 20 minutes to 300 minutes.
    [0074] Figure 3 shows MET images for samples prepared with different milling times: (a) 150 minutes, (b) 240 minutes, and (c) 300 minutes.
    [0076] Figure 4 shows the ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of the precursor graphite and for different milling times between 20 and 300 minutes.
    [0078] Figure 5 shows the characterization carried out by MCR: (a) Evolution of the average Raman spectra from the starting graphite up to 300 minutes of grinding, (b) relationship between the amplitudes of bands D and G, and (c) representation of the amplitude ratio of the D and G bands between the amplitude ratio of the D 'and G bands. Figure c shows the regions where eigenvalues of (i) graphite in the massive state and of (ii) GBMs are obtained .
    [0080] Figure 6 shows two XRD patterns of samples obtained at two oscillation frequencies during 240 minutes of milling. The upper standard corresponds to a sample prepared at 250 rpm and the lower standard corresponds to 1500 rpm.
    [0082] Figure 7 shows two XRD patterns of samples obtained at an oscillation frequency of 1500 rpm during 120 minutes of grinding, taking into account one ball (lower standard) or two balls (upper standard) as grinding bodies.
    [0084] PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
    [0086] The present invention is illustrated by the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting of its scope.
    [0088] Example 1.
    [0089] This example refers to obtaining mesoporous samples of FLG compound powder with a high degree of defects depending on the grinding time carried out at 1500 rpm (25 Hz).
    [0091] The morphology and structural properties of the starting graphite are studied by transmission electron microscopy (MET) and scanning (SEM) (Figure 1). In them, it is observed that the starting graphite has a flake shape and is constituted by monocrystalline particles with a lateral dimension between 2 and 50 pm with a thickness less than 100 nm.
    [0093] On this material, grinding is carried out in an oscillating vibratory mill (MM400, Retsch GmbH.) At 25 Hz (1500 rpm) from 20 to 300 minutes, with a metal container whose interior is coated with tungsten carbide and a ball composed of same material. A graphite: ball mass ratio of 1:25 is established using 1 g of natural flake graphite ("Graphite flake" from Alfa Aesar). During milling, interruptions are made every 20 minutes in order to control and help bring the temperature of the container close to room temperature.
    [0095] Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) corresponding to the starting graphite and as a function of grinding from 20 to 300 minutes. In the XRD pattern corresponding to the starting graphite, reflections belonging to polycrystalline graphite and an extensive maximum located between 2 ° and 10 ° characteristic of irregular mesoporous structures are observed. As the milling progresses, a progressive decrease in the intensity of the maximums is observed. In particular, the maximum of diffraction located at 26.5 ° corresponds to the family of planes (002) of graphite and is related to the crystalline order in the stacking direction (Z). The lower its intensity, the lower the percentage of graphite in the massive state present in the samples. This trend, added to a shift towards lower values of 20, is the trace that indicates the transformation of the starting graphite in the form of flakes towards materials with structural properties similar to graphene (~ 24 °). On the other hand, no characteristic maximum of graphene oxide (11.5 °) or of any other oxidized compound is observed that could devalue the physical properties of the manufactured samples.
    [0096] As an example of obtaining FLG, MET images are shown for the milling times of 100, 240 and 300 minutes (Figure 3). In all the cases studied, a large number of FLGs oriented with respect to the electron beam of the microscope are observed. As the milling time progresses, the number of layers that make up the FLG decreases and obvious signs of agglomeration of nanostructures are observed in the case of 300 minutes. These signs of agglomeration do not imply that the FLG structure is destroyed.
    [0098] The electromagnetic absorption properties in the ultraviolet-visible range show a single absorption maximum around 265 nm (Figure 4). This maximum is associated with characteristic excitations of materials based on graphite and graphene without oxidized products. These results support those obtained by XRD (Figure 2).
    [0100] Finally, confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) is able to discern between different graphite compounds and GBMs. In Figure 5a the average spectra obtained from different representative areas of the samples are represented. Bands D, G, D 'and 2D are identified. When GBMs are formed there is a shift towards lower frequencies of the G and 2D bands. This occurs for grinding times greater than 80 minutes. After this time, the samples show a high amount of FLG. Furthermore, the relationships between the amplitudes of the D and G bands are plotted against the milling time. Values calculated from 80 minutes of grinding are typical for GBMs. Regarding the nature of the defects, the representation of the amplitude relationship between D and G as a function of the amplitude relationship between D 'and G, reveals typical values of GBMs with a certain degree of sp3 hybridization at milling times. above 180 minutes. Below this value, the defects formed are preferably carbon vacancies in the structure of the GBMs manufactured in the present invention.
    [0102] This fact, together with their nanostructuring, makes them potentially usable in catalytic applications, chemical and / or resistive sensors and microwave absorption (among other applications).
    [0104] Example 2
    [0106] This example refers to obtaining FLG with a high degree of defects depending on the frequency of oscillation of the grinding time.
    [0108] The manufacturing process of the sample obtained in this application example is the same as that described in example 1, except that the oscillation frequency used in the grinding process is 250 rpm. This example is intended to claim that for frequencies below 1500 rpm, high purity GBMs are not obtained using the same grinding times, as is the case in example 1.
    [0110] In Figure 6 the XRD corresponding to 240 minutes of milling with oscillation frequencies of 250 and 1500 rpm are represented by way of example. The corresponding XRD pattern for an oscillation frequency of 250 rpm manifests graphite characteristics in the massive state with a pronounced maximum around 26.5 ° (Figure 6, upper XRD pattern). This is accompanied by a shoulder (around 25 °), attributed to graphite-based compounds with different crystalline domain size from the starting graphite. These characteristics lead to samples with a high degree of heterogeneity when compared with the sample obtained for a frequency of 1500 rpm (Figure 6, lower XRD pattern). The XRD pattern obtained for this last frequency of oscillation does not present characteristics of a double size distribution and the complete formation of FLG is demonstrated together with the characterization provided in example 1 (Figures 2-5).
    [0112] Example 3
    [0114] This example refers to obtaining FLGs with a high degree of defects depending on the use of one or two balls during the grinding process.
    [0116] To check whether the formation of FLG is produced effectively by introducing one or two balls as grinding bodies of the starting graphite, two samples are manufactured with identical grinding time of 120 minutes and oscillation frequency of 1500 rpm. That is, the same conditions as those used in Example 1, but with the addition of an extra ball.
    [0118] Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns obtained for one (lower pattern) and two balls (upper pattern). If the characteristic diffraction maxima of graphite are taken into account (marked with "+"), there are no major differences between the two and they have the same same degree of graphitization in both cases. The degree of graphitization can be compared through the ratio of intensities between the reflection of the planes (002) and (101) (around 44 °). This value is close to ~ 11.1 in the two cases and, therefore, there are no differences in relation to the observed graphite compounds. However, in the case of two balls, there are three additional diffraction maxima marked with an "x" in the upper pattern of Figure 7. The maxima marked "x" correspond to tungsten carbide particles and therefore , there is an undesirable contamination that can affect any technological application mentioned in the previous sections. As a consequence, only the use of a tungsten carbide ball should be used as grinding bodies.
    权利要求:
    Claims (11)
    [1]
    1. Large-scale production method of low-layer graphene (FLG) with high degree of defects from graphite by high-energy ball milling by dry oscillating motion characterized in that:
    - the precursor is graphite in the form of flakes with a length between 2 and 50 pm and a thickness of less than 100 nm,
    and the grinding is carried out in a metal container covered with a material that has a Knoop hardness greater than 1,000 kg / mm2 in the presence of balls of the same material, with an oscillation frequency between 1,000 and 1,500 rpm and a mass ratio between the ball or balls and the graphite used between 1:20 and 1:30.
    [2]
    2. Large-scale production method of low-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 1, because the grinding process is carried out at ambient temperature and pressure, in an inert atmosphere and without additives or subsequent processing treatments.
    [3]
    3. Large-scale production method of few-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 1, where the graphite flakes are monocrystalline.
    [4]
    4. Method of large-scale production of low-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 1, wherein the mass ratio between graphite and the ball or balls used is preferably 1:25.
    [5]
    5. Method of large-scale production of low-layer graphene (FLG), according to previous claims, where the material that covers the metal container and forms the balls is tungsten carbide.
    [6]
    6. Method of large-scale production of low-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 5, where grinding is carried out with a single ball of tungsten carbide.
    [7]
    7. Large-scale production method for low-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 6, where the ball has a volume ratio of between 0.8: 1 and 1.2: 1, preferably 1: 1 with respect to the graphite used and with a volume between 1:48 and 1:52, preferably 1:50 with respect to the container container.
    [8]
    8. Method of large-scale production of few-layer graphene (FLG), according to previous claims, where the grinding time varies between 20 and 300 minutes to obtain mesoporous structures.
    [9]
    9. Large-scale production method of low-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 8, where the milling time varies between 20 and 100 minutes to obtain different size distributions corresponding to the starting graphite and FLG.
    [10]
    10. Large-scale production method of low-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 8, where the milling time varies between 120 and 300 minutes to obtain homogeneous size distributions corresponding to FLG.
    [11]
    11. Large-scale production method of few-layer graphene (FLG), according to claim 8, where FLG is obtained with a thickness between 3 and 10 layers of graphene depending on the grinding time, so that the number of layers decreases according to increases grinding time.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    Zhao et al.2010|Preparation of graphene by exfoliation of graphite using wet ball milling
    Esmaeili et al.2014|Facile and fast synthesis of graphene oxide nanosheets via bath ultrasonic irradiation
    Romero et al.2018|Comparative study of different scalable routes to synthesize graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide
    Yu et al.2010|Vertically aligned boron nitride nanosheets: chemical vapor synthesis, ultraviolet light emission, and superhydrophobicity
    Sun et al.2008|Preparation and characterization of graphite nanosheets from detonation technique
    CA2693309C|2011-10-18|Production of nano-structures
    Yang et al.2011|Hydrothermal synthesis of MoO3 nanobelt‐graphene composites
    Jahanshahi et al.2013|Synthesis and characterization of thermally-reduced graphene
    Liu et al.2014|Simple, green and high-yield production of single-or few-layer graphene by hydrothermal exfoliation of graphite
    US10876024B2|2020-12-29|Highly thermally conductive hexagonal boron nitride/alumina composite made from commercial hexagonal boron nitride
    Can et al.2011|Preparation of graphene nanosheets through detonation
    Qin et al.2011|Catalyst-free growth of mono-and few-atomic-layer boron nitride sheets by chemical vapor deposition
    Li et al.2011|Synthesis, structural, optical and mechanical characterization of SrB 2 O 4 nanorods
    Sun et al.2008|Production of nanosized graphite powders from natural graphite by detonation
    Truong et al.2012|Preparation and characterization of graphene nanoplatelets from natural graphite via intercalation and exfoliation with tetraalkylammoniumbromide
    Wang et al.2017|Bimetallic catalytic growth of boron nitride nanotubes
    Ham et al.2014|Freeze-drying-induced changes in the properties of graphene oxides
    Ismail et al.2019|Synthesis and characterization of graphene derived from rice husks
    Sreedhar et al.2018|Synthesis and study of reduced graphene oxide layers under microwave irradiation
    Matsoso et al.2017|Single-step synthesis of crystalline h-BN quantum-and nanodots embedded in boron carbon nitride films
    Mokhtar et al.2017|Thermally reduced graphene oxide: synthesis, structural and electrical properties
    ES2779151B2|2020-12-17|Large-scale production in a single step and at room temperature of material composed of few graphene sheets with a high degree of defects by means of high energy oscillatory dry mechanical milling.
    Sun et al.2017|One-pot synthesis of reduced graphene oxide@ boron nitride nanosheet hybrids with enhanced oxidation-resistant properties
    Bakhshi et al.2016|Synthesis and characterization of carbon-coated cobalt ferrite nanoparticles
    Chkhartishvili et al.2010|Molar binding energy of zigzag and armchair single-walled boron nitride nanotubes
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    WO2022008783A1|2022-01-13|
    ES2779151B2|2020-12-17|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    WO2017056086A1|2015-09-30|2017-04-06|B.G. Negev Technologies And Applications Ltd., At Ben-Gurion University|A process for the production of few-layered graphene|
    WO2017105208A1|2015-12-16|2017-06-22|Centro De Investigación En Química Aplicada|Process for preparing concentrates of graphene nanoplatelets via the milling of graphite and exfoliants|
    CN106744877A|2016-12-21|2017-05-31|成都新柯力化工科技有限公司|A kind of method that dry grinding stripping prepares the device and production Graphene of Graphene|
    法律状态:
    2020-08-13| BA2A| Patent application published|Ref document number: 2779151 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: A1 Effective date: 20200813 |
    2020-12-17| FG2A| Definitive protection|Ref document number: 2779151 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: B2 Effective date: 20201217 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    ES202030709A|ES2779151B2|2020-07-10|2020-07-10|Large-scale production in a single step and at room temperature of material composed of few graphene sheets with a high degree of defects by means of high energy oscillatory dry mechanical milling.|ES202030709A| ES2779151B2|2020-07-10|2020-07-10|Large-scale production in a single step and at room temperature of material composed of few graphene sheets with a high degree of defects by means of high energy oscillatory dry mechanical milling.|
    PCT/ES2021/070502| WO2022008783A1|2020-07-10|2021-07-09|Large-scale, one-step, room-temperature production of a material consisting of a few graphene flakes with a high degree of defects by high-energy oscillatory dry mechanical milling|
    [返回顶部]